For High Net Worth Clients
How can I manage a portfolio for you in a way that adds value beyond what is done by a typical investment manager or mutual fund?
Many investment managers focus on studying companies in great detail, and base their investment strategy on their stock picking approach, focusing on stocks with certain characteristics such as high earnings growth or low valuation levels.
In many cases their investment policy is based on the idea that “no one can time the market,” so they do not change their investment posture as market conditions change, and they maintain a fixed asset allocation, such as 60% stocks / 40% bonds.
This is a prudent investment approach which works well over long time periods, and I am not criticizing it. However, given the fact that historically, stocks have had an average return of roughly 10% per year, and bonds a return in the single digits, this means the typical portfolio managed in this way is likely to have a return in the neighborhood of roughly 8% per year, on average, with some good years and some bad years.
I am proposing a more dynamic, active approach, aiming for higher returns, by using various strategies and tactics to take advantage of market conditions when opportunities arise.
These tactics may include making large changes in asset allocation or sector weights, and may involve the use of leveraged or inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Example of successful market analysis to make a large profit:
In March 2020, the stock market was in a sharp downtrend due to the coronavirus crisis. In my blog post entitled “Market Comments: Week ending 3-13-20”, I wrote that our strategy was to place buy limit orders on selected stocks and triple leveraged ETFs. As an example I said to place buy limit orders on TQQQ, the triple long Nasdaq 100 fund, at prices in the $35 – $45 range.
(Note: in general, with a buy limit order, we specify a certain price at which we want to buy, and this limit price is below the current price. The order can stay in effect for 30 days or more, and it will be executed if the price drops to our limit price.)
Figure 1 Using limit orders to buy into an extremely oversold market
The idea was to buy into the stock market if it became extremely oversold. Because we don’t know exactly where the low will be, we place a series of buy limit orders at staggered prices. If the market drops to one or more of these prices, we will be buying at very oversold levels, from which a rebound or recovery is likely.
Shortly after we published the 3-13-20 blog post, the stock market continued its sharp decline, and on 3-23-20, TQQQ hit a low of $32.27 (see Figure 1 above). Therefore, all buy limit orders at prices between $35 and $45 were filled, meaning that we established a position in TQQQ with an average cost in the $40 range.
Then in late March and early April, the market turned up, and TQQQ started rising. In our 4-8-20 blog post, we said to place SELL limit orders at prices of $56, $59, and $63, as a way to exit the trade and lock in a profit. On April 14th, TQQQ rose to almost $64, meaning that all these sell orders were completed.
The exact return on the strategy depends on how many shares were bought and sold at each price. By using three separate buy limit orders, we acquire some shares at $35, some at $40, and some at $45, then sell them at $56, $59, and $63. In general, we want to buy more shares at the lower prices. So the exact return depends on the number of shares in each lot, but the average cost was near $40 and the average selling price was near $60, for an overall return of roughly 50%.
The bottom line is that by executing a strategy that we specified on this blog in advance, before it happened, we locked in a large profit of 50% in a month. This was done in the midst of a very volatile market environment. (Note: using limit orders in this way is a technique that I learned while working as an independent trader.)
By comparison, most money managers would not have used this approach, because they believe that “no one can time the market.”
Yet in my opinion the type of situation that occurred in March 2020 presented a good opportunity to make outsized gains. Entering the market when it is extremely oversold has a very good risk / reward ratio, so it is appropriate to do some buying, and in fact to use leverage, in these situations. The downside risk is limited, because the market has already gone down dramatically by the time we buy into it.
TQQQ uses triple leverage, meaning it moves three times as much as the underlying index – for example, if the index rises by 5%, TQQQ will rise by 15%. Also TQQQ is diversified among 100 stocks, which reduces the risk compared to buying a single stock.
Thus with a $1 million portfolio, we might have put at least 30% of the portfolio, or $300,000 into this trade. The 50% gain would produce a profit of $150,000 in just a few weeks. In fact in my blog post for the week of 3-13-20, I stated that we should use this strategy on multiple ETFs, just using TQQQ as an example. So if we had also done similar trades with a few other triple leveraged ETFs, such as SPXL (for the S&P 500), we might have done these trades with a larger amount, say half the portfolio, or $500,000, thereby making a profit of $250,000.
Therefore, if high net worth clients do not have some portion of their assets managed by an advisor who is making these types of transactions, they may be missing out on some valuable opportunities in the market.
Of course, in most market environments, we cannot expect to make such large returns in a short period of time.
For normal market environments, my investment approach is based on the proven principles of leading investors such as William O’Neil, founder of Investor’s Business Daily. I have studied the Investor’s Business Daily methodology in detail, and I can put this investment approach to work for you.
I have done extensive research on how to combine fundamental data with technical analysis to analyze the market.
I know how to read the market and identify situations in which buying or selling should be done, based on practical, proven methods. Ideally we want to buy stocks with good earnings and good chart patterns, which are in strong industry groups and sectors, and we also need to consider the condition of the overall market.
An example of a winning stock is shown in the following chart. Take Two Interactive (TTWO), an electronic gaming stock, had strong earnings growth and other bullish fundamentals, and it formed a technical “buy” signal when it broke out to a new high in April 2017.
Figure 2 Take Two Interactive (TTWO) Weekly Chart – formed a “buy” signal as of 4/21/17
This chart shows an example of how to identify a winning stock BEFORE it makes a big move up. This case study is based on the Investor’s Business Daily methodology, along with additional work that I have done on coordinating the analysis of stocks, sectors and the overall market.
At any given time, hundreds of stocks will have good fundamentals, and the vast majority of all stocks are given “Buy” ratings by analysts who follow the companies. In order to determine which ones are actually poised to outperform, we need additional analysis, involving signs of institutional buying and selling (as seen in the charts), as well as the behavior of industry groups, sectors, and the overall market.
As seen in Figure 2 above, in April 2017, TTWO was in a long-term uptrend, but had pulled back to its 50-day moving average. Then, in the week of 4/21/17, it broke out to a new high, as shown by the arrow on the right side of the chart. This was a bullish technical development. In addition, other stocks in the same industry group were doing well, the whole technology sector showed good relative strength, and the S&P 500 had just completed a pullback. This combination of circumstances was very bullish and provided a high degree of confidence in buying this stock in April 2017.
As seen in Figure 3 below, after the April 2017 “buy” signal, the stock outperformed the S&P 500 by a wide margin. From the end of April 2017 to year-end 2017, TTWO rose from $63 to $110, for a gain of 75%, compared to 12% for the S&P 500.
Figure 3 Take Two Interactive (TTWO) — Performance after April 2017 “buy” signal
I have set up a weekly research process to consistently find stocks like this on an ongoing basis. This involves analyzing the status of the overall market, along with sectors and industry groups, while using various state-of-the-art software packages and databases to identify stocks with bullish or bearish characteristics.
This process enables us to reach valuable investment conclusions. Additional discussion is provided in various reports that I have written, for example those shown on this website under the heading “Excerpts from White Papers.”
Regular updates on the account:
For high net worth investors, we will provide regular updates on all activity in your account, discussing any trades that were made and why.
Please contact Jon Strauss to discuss in more detail, and to get started today.
Jonathan Strauss, CFA
513 – 379 – 2792 (cell / text)
jon@straussresearch.com
Note: because the investment style outlined above involves leveraged ETFs, it might be considered more risky than a conservative buy-and-hold approach. But for some high net worth investors, this more aggressive approach may be appropriate for a portion of their assets.